Month: October 2025

A Theoretical Proposal for Fiscal Discipline and Debt Management – an interview with Josh L. Ascough

UK public sector net debt was at 96.4% of GDP as of the end of August 2025 and the level of debt at its highest since the early 1960s.  These problems are not unique to the UK and many time writer for the Croydon Constitutionalists, Josh L. Ascough released a new book ‘A Theoretical Proposal for Fiscal Discipline and Debt Management‘ that addresses this issue seen across the western world.  We speak with Josh.

“government or specific politician is looking to obtain a political legacy by creating a large infrastructure project; I think a certain HS2 project comes to most people’s minds”

Can you give our readers a brief overview of the book?

A Theoretical Proposal for Fiscal Discipline and Debt Management examines the risks of unconstrained debt spending by governments by examining the inevitable trade-offs and what is referred to as GAP (Government Agency Problems) that occur when governments have, in practice, no limit to their debt spending. Some of these are over-investment of government projects, where loose access to debt financing can encourage governments to maintain investment in projects whose costs have risen beyond their initial evaluation and assumed benefits, and legacy, where a government or specific politician is looking to obtain a political legacy by creating a large infrastructure project; I think a certain HS2 project comes to most people’s minds when they hear these two. And finally, the book ends with proposal a fiscal rule to limit the level of debt spending.

Your book proposes a 1.25 Rule, without giving away too much, what are the basics of the rule?

The 1.25 is a fiscal ratio that targets a maximum level of debt spending in relation to the nominal tax revenue the government receives and works in a similar fashion to the debt-to-equity finance in corporate finance models. For a simple example if we suppose the government revenue is 500 billion, then according to the ratio the government would have a maximum of 625 billion it could spend via debt. This would create the incentive for governments to effectively and efficiently allocate public resources into areas that will have long-term benefits with high long-term payoffs while still maintaining enough debt spending for initial investments into public works and as a reserve for crisis.

“create the incentive for governments to effectively and efficiently allocate public resources into areas that will have long-term benefits with high long-term payoffs”

This is your second book, your first being ‘Inflation and Monetary Policy: Understanding the Origins and Costs’.  What were a couple of key points from that book?

A major point was that when working on a novel approach to the Environmental Kuznets Curve; which measures the relationship between income per capita and environmental degradation, and typically shows that as countries become richer, they reach a certain point where they’re able to afford more environmentally friendly and sustainable policies and sources of energy. However the problem is the curve uses nominal income rather than being adjusted for inflation, and so the work I did showed that when adjusted for inflation, many countries are in what I called a treadmill state, whereby inflation continues to erode the purchasing power of income per capita, leading to a continuing loop of environmental policies being unaffordable; so those who argue for more environmental protection policies should first look to stabilise and reduce inflation.

Another key point would be Nominal Gross Domestic Product (NGDP) targeting which ties to my second book, as I suggest combining the 1.25 rule as a fiscal policy with NGDP targeting as a monetary policy. In the first book however NGDP targeting is suggested as an alternative to inflation targeting and as a second-best solution to a truly free banking system, as it is able to emulate the monetary equilibrium that the free banking area naturally provided, but as a proxy, and would be able to respond to supply and demand shocks more appropriately than inflation targeting.

“those who argue for more environmental protection policies should first look to stabilise and reduce inflation”

How can people get these books, and more generally get in touch?  (you don’t have to answer the get in touch part unless want)

People can find these books on Amazon for relatively cheap prices, the first is £12.99 and the newest book is £7.99. I keep prices down for my work as the money from them isn’t as important to me as getting the research and the final work out into the public.

A Theoretical Proposal for Fiscal Discipline and Debt Management – https://www.amazon.co.uk/Theoretical-Proposal-Fiscal-Discipline-Management/dp/B0FWRLPV3R/ref=sr_1_1

Inflation and Monetary Policy: Understanding the Origins and Costs – https://www.amazon.co.uk/Inflation-Monetary-Policy-Understanding-Origins/dp/B0F91P73RV/ref=sr_1_2

You can read more from Josh on our site at https://croydonconstitutionalists.uk/category/josh-l-ascough/

2 decades of battling ideas

By Mike Swadling

“positioned between the Communists Party of Britain Marxist-Leninist and Conservatives for Women was the Politics in Pubs stall, our partner organisation”

The weekend of the 18/19 October saw the 20th Anniversary Battle of Ideas take place in Church House in Westminster.  Once again over 100 debates, conversations and interviews took place where the challenges of today were discussed and the audience had the opportunity to take part.

Outside the main rooms and in the main hall, were stalls from a variety of organisations including the Free Speech Union, the SDP, #Together, Academics for Academic Freedom, Global Warming Policy Foundation, and many others.  This is not to forget positioned between the Communists Party of Britain Marxist-Leninist and Conservatives for Women was the Politics in Pubs stall, our partner organisation, which was partly manned during the weekend by myself.

The first debate I went to was about votes for 16-year-olds.  A wide-ranging debate which included my personal view that if people want votes at 16, then 16 year olds should take on the responsibilities of adulthood.  The debate also spoke extensively about the perceived left-wing bias in schools.  One interesting and rare moment of harsh pushback from the audience was when a member of the panel who was also a Labour activist decided to call Brexit voters stupid.  Clearly a party determined to drive down its support.

“The first debate I went to was about votes for 16-year-olds.  A wide-ranging debate which included my personal view that if people want votes at 16, then 16 year olds should take on the responsibilities of adulthood”

Other sessions I attended included discussions on the fear of populism, the state of the UK economy, ‘state incompetence’, the ‘police have lost the plot’ and ‘the importance of learning to drink underage’.  Many of these were in podcasts links for some recommended ones from the day are below:

At the time of writing 2025 videos are yet to be posted but you can see videos from previous years and no doubt will soon see videos from the weekend on the Battle of Ideas YouTube channel.

You can also follow more of what happened on the day via the #BattleFest and #BattleFest25 X/Twitter tags, and get details from the weekends brochure.

Lastly if any of this has wetted your appetite you can already book tickets for the 2026 Battle of Ideas, I hope to see you there.

“a Labour activist decided to call Brexit voters stupid.  Clearly a party determined to drive down its support”

The Ulsterisation of Britain: A Libertarian Perspective

By TheYellow&TheGreen

“The sectarian aesthetics once confined to Northern Ireland are re-emerging here at home”

Operation Raise the Colours has succeeded spectacularly. Lampposts across the country now bear the marks of defiance. The campaign has borne fruit, forcing Labour to tighten its grip on immigration by introducing digital ID. That debate deserves its own article.

This one is about something deeper. Something darker. The Ulsterisation of Britain.

Across our towns and cities, dividing lines are hardening, cultural, political and social. The sectarian aesthetics once confined to Northern Ireland are re-emerging here at home.

A new tribalism has taken root. The right has embraced identitarianism and with it the tactics and violence of collective ideology. Our streets are turning into battlegrounds. Symbols rise and fall in daily cycles of retaliation.

The left is no less tribal. It dresses its own divisions in moral language, but its identity politics is equally intolerant, demanding conformity and punishing dissent. The symbols may differ, yet the instinct to sort people into camps of virtue and vice remains the same.

From every corner of the collectivist spectrum, groups are organising, marching, preparing for confrontation. Each claims moral authority. None stands for individual liberty.

“we cannot ignore the material world or the reality of the situation. Individuals are being abused and assaulted, and private property is being targeted”

We are individualists by nature; we have always lacked the perspective or the experience to deal with sectarian politics. Yet we cannot ignore the material world or the reality of the situation. Individuals are being abused and assaulted, and private property is being targeted.

The question is not whether libertarians should take sides, but how we can stand apart, defending freedom and autonomy without becoming another faction in a growing civil conflict.

Regardless of how we feel about the other side or even our own, we must remember that there is a person on the other side, a person with feelings, thoughts and flaws. If we lose sight of that, we surrender to the same collectivist mindset we claim to oppose.

Liberty cannot survive in a world where people are dehumanised into tribes and enemies. It survives only when we recognise the individual, even in those we disagree with, as an equal in dignity and freedom.

That, above all else, is the libertarian line in the sand.

“Regardless of how we feel about the other side or even our own, we must remember that there is a person on the other side”

You can learn more about the Libertarian party at https://libertarianpartyuk.com/.

Originally posted on 24th October at https://www.facebook.com/libertarianuk/posts/the-ulsterisation-of-britain-a-libertarian-perspectiveby-theyellowthegreenoperat/1372713361150263/

Interview with Daniel Tebbutt Deputy Chair of Reform UK Croydon

Reform UK has been busy setting up branches across the country.  In June we published details of the new Chair of the then newly formed Croydon branch of Reform UK.  Former Councillor Daniel Tebbutt has recently been appointed the Deputy Chair of the branch.  He writes for us about his path to this new role below.

“I got my friends and family involved to help deliver leaflets, and when people asked me “aren’t you a bit young for this?”, I responded, “age doesn’t matter when you’re as passionate as I am”

Residents deserve to know who and what they are voting for – I pride myself on being open and transparent when it comes to my political record.

I joined Labour at 15 years old, I was a big believer in Jeremy Corbyn and he appealed to me, as he did so many other young people at that time.

I was elected on a Labour ticket as a District Councillor at the age of 18. I worked hard to get elected, I got my friends and family involved to help deliver leaflets, and when people asked me “aren’t you a bit young for this?”, I responded, “age doesn’t matter when you’re as passionate as I am”. That’s what I was and have always been, passionate about delivering meaningful, lasting change.

So here I was, 18-year-old local lad now a part of a Labour Group, I still remember the excitement of stepping into the chamber for the first time – there’s nothing quite like it!

“Shortly afterwards, as I had lost all faith in the party and its principles, I resigned my Labour whip and sat as an Independent. Do I regret my decision? No”

Over the following months, I consulted a Conservative Cabinet Member who was more knowledgeable on planning than I was.  A controversial application had been submitted in my ward and I sought some advice on how to approach this.

There was no ‘cloak and dagger’ or stealth involved, a simple coffee and chat at the local coffee shop.

On discovering my conversation with the Cabinet Member, I was ordered to attend a meeting at the council offices with Labour Group Officers. Amongst other things, an individual who was clearly furious mentioned that “Tories should be put up against a wall and shot”, I was horrified. I still remember to this day, my shock at this statement.

Shortly afterwards, as I had lost all faith in the party and its principles, I resigned my Labour whip and sat as an Independent. Do I regret my decision? No, because I wouldn’t be where I am today without taking it.

I soon realised that I wasn’t able to deliver on my promises to residents as an Independent Councillor, I simply didn’t have the experience or the network behind me. These were a couple of reasons why I joined the Local Conservatives.

“One of the duties I enjoy most is collaborating with the membership – I’m determined to drive Reform’s agenda for renewal and will work to get as many councillors in Croydon as possible”

On leaving Leicestershire and moving to Croydon in 2022, I re-joined the Labour Party as I thought that was where I belonged. I’d got materially involved in Croydon Labour in 2024, supported the mayoral campaign (even writing a policy document!), and became an officer. I applied to be a Councillor and was offered an interview, which I declined.

Almost as soon as Labour entered Government, they started breaking promises. I sat back, like many others who voted for Labour in the General Election and thought “I didn’t vote for this. I didn’t vote for vulnerable people, pensioners, farmers to be targeted”, I was losing faith in Starmer and the party leadership.

And then over the summer of 2025, Starmer announced that the UK Government would recognise Palestine as a state in September, if a ceasefire wasn’t agreed. A move which terrorist organisation, Hamas – celebrated, and in turn, betraying one of the UK’s closest allies, Israel. For me, this was the final nail in the coffin. I drafted my resignation letter, cut up my membership card and left Labour – I no longer felt represented by this party.

On leaving Labour I felt, and still feel, that I can make a positive difference through politics, I’m passionate about improving the lives of people. My mission is to help renew Croydon, forging it into a Borough that fills residents with pride. This is why I joined Reform UK – a party that I’m proud to be a member of, one that aligns with my beliefs.

Owing to my experience, I was asked to take up the role of Interim Deputy Chair of Reform UK Croydon, I accepted. One of the duties I enjoy most is collaborating with the membership – I’m determined to drive Reform’s agenda for renewal and will work to get as many councillors in Croydon as possible. I believe only Reform can fix Croydon after almost two decades of managed decline.

You can find out more about Dan on his Facebook Page, you can also follow Reform Croydon on Facebook, Twitter (X), and online at https://reformukcroydon.co.uk/.

Julia Searle, Reform UK Candidate for the Lingfield, Crowhurst & Tandridge Ward by-election.

Julia Searle is the Reform UK candidate for the 6th November, Lingfield, Crowhurst & Tandridge ward by-election in Tandridge. We spoke with Julia about her decision to stand.

“I’m a fighter and I’m here to be heard, to stand up for local people’s viewpoints and change sickness into healthy progress”

Can you introduce yourself to our readers, and tell us what made you decide to run?

I’ve lived in Surrey all my life. I have brought up my children in my property for the last 27 years. I have been a Parent/Teacher and Chairperson at my local infants’ school in Dormansland, as well as my children attending Lingfield Primary School before going on to senior schools.

I’ve always been an independent thinker; I’ve set up and run multiple businesses that I still run after 17 years. I’ve had the challenge of bringing up my children on my own, making ends meet and paying my mortgage.

Over the years, I have stood in local elections, I’ve stood in Reigate as an MP candidate and for Police and Crime Commissioner for Surrey. I’m pretty well versed with understanding the impact of government involvement at local level and the sickness that is spreading into our local communities as a result, particularly the relaxed planning laws. I’m not frightened about voicing my opinions, they need to be voiced.

I’m not frightened to object to ridiculous local council decisions on excessive council taxes and lack of realistically affordable housing. 

I’m a fighter and I’m here to be heard, to stand up for local people’s viewpoints and change sickness into healthy progress.

“We have a ridiculous decision by the Labour government to allow farmers to change agricultural land into solar farms. what a blight on the landscape!”

You’re the candidate for Lingfield & Crowhurst ward. What are the main concerns in the area?

My policies are around protecting the green belt, using brown field sites for housing and making it affordable for young people to get on the property ladder.

I often speak with local residents about their concerns. We have a ridiculous decision by the Labour government to allow farmers to change agricultural land into solar farms. what a blight on the landscape! 

Is this not insane?

There is an elephant in the room. For many years, the local Conservatives – and now Labour – have been turning a blind eye to unauthorised traveller sites, which are blighting the green belt.

In both Bones Lane Lingfield and just outside Lingfield towards the Mormon Temple, there is an unmatched level of activity where mobile homes are being put in fields.

The council is weak and slow. New rules to tackle this spread before green belt becomes a thing of the past and council taxpayers’ foot the bill for people who do not want to pay any tax. 

Lastly, we have young people and war veterans locally cannot get onto the property ladder. They have lived in the area for much of their lives but housing is not affordable. Waiting lists are long and the wrong people jump the queue. This needs to be addressed now. 

What do you see as the major issues more widely in Tandridge and if elected what do you hope to champion?

As I’ve said above any of the issues I’ve mentioned are major. I’m a fearless person; I can hold others to account and challenge poor decisions. Let’s change local laws on removing unauthorised housing sites from green belt land in Tandridge. 

I want to ensure we get solar farms on brownfield sites OR pay businesses to have them on their land and get them off agricultural green belt.  I believe we also need a scheme that works for the young and veterans for actual affordable housing.

“we have young people and war veterans locally cannot get onto the property ladder. They have lived in the area for much of their lives but housing is not affordable”

How can people find out more or get involved in the campaign?

My leaflets will be distributed to local residents soon, please vote for me. Become a candidate for Reform or even join our local Reform meetings by contacting our local Chair Chris Scott at  eastsurrey@reformparty.uk.

Green Party threat to the UK economy

“His politics are closer to the far-left than the Liberal Democrats he once stood for”

Though the rise in popularity of Reform UK has hogged the headlines, the increase in popularity of the Green Party has been as consistent as the fall from grace of Keir Starmer’s Labour.

Are they just a harmless bunch of harmless vegetarian eco-fanatics? Let’s have a look. Zack Polanski has been the Leader of the Green Party of England and Wales since September this year.

After changing his name from David Paulsen, university followed and then a career in the Arts. He worked a variety of roles, including actor and director. Polanski also sang for the London International Gospel Choir. One must wonder why he didn’t call himself out for cultural appropriation.

He then famously worked as a hypnotherapist, getting caught out by The Sun trying to make a reporter’s breasts grow larger. It’s all in the mind, apparently.

Policy-wise, Polanski has advocated for increasing taxes on billionaires, renationalising water companies, challenging governments for what he sees as insufficient subsidy on net zero policies and regulating private corporations even more. His politics are closer to the far-left than the Liberal Democrats he once stood for.

Given their leader’s political views as eco-populist, linking broad issues like high costs of living and the climate crisis as both being caused by the wealthy, it seems the Green Party is a serious threat to the UK economy. Green not through anything to do with the environment, but rather, envy!

Martin Day – Mercia Coordinator, Libertarian Party UK

“the Green Party is a serious threat to the UK economy. Green not through anything to do with the environment, but rather, envy!”

You can learn more about the Libertarian party at https://libertarianpartyuk.com/.

Originally posted on 11th October at https://www.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=1361419042279695&id=100052348363639&mibextid=wwXIfr&rdid=T5uMhlVjtwaBAV90#

Image from Grok.

Jacqueline Thomson, Reform UK Candidate for the Caterham Valley division by-election.

Jacqueline Thomson is the Reform UK candidate for the 16th October, Caterham Valley division by-election in Surrey. We spoke with Jacqueline about her decision to stand.

“I know that the fresh approach offered by REFORM UK is what our country badly needs”

Can you introduce yourself to our readers, and tell us what made you decide to run?

My name is Jacqueline Thomson I have three grown up children, three grandchildren and a very supportive husband. I am now retired. Previously I dedicated my career to the South East Coast Ambulance Service and before that, I worked at Life Care, Caterham-On-The-Hill looking after people with learning disabilities.  

I have always been interested in how our country is run. I feel very strongly that ordinary people like me have been completely ignored for many years and now I am retired I want to get more involved with our future Government. I know that the fresh approach offered by REFORM UK is what our country badly needs. I am tremendously honoured that REFORM UK has given me the opportunity to represent Caterham Valley in the Bye Election on 16th. October 2025.   

You’re the candidate for Caterham Valley division. What are the main concerns in the area?

The concerns that keep being raised include:

  • Croydon Road Works  – Delays to the Croydon Road redevelopment work caused by issues with existing drainage. 
  • Flooding  – Often caused by poor drainage 
  • Parish Council Merger  – The proposal to merge the Caterham Hill and Caterham Valley Parish Councils. 
  • Town masterplan – Looking at a broader vision for the development of the Hill and Valley communities. 

“I have always been interested in how our country is run. I feel very strongly that ordinary people like me have been completely ignored for many years”

What do you see as the major issues more widely in Surrey and if elected what do you hope to champion?

  • Cost of living crisis –This leading to increased demand for crisis support
  • Crime and Community – Retail theft, anti-social behaviour, domestic abuse, child exploitation, serious and organised crime. 
  • Infrastructure and Highways  – Pothole problems, poor road surfaces and pavements, issues with trees and hedges. 

I would like to especially champion solutions to reduce the abuse of children and solve the pothole problems.

Jonathan Rollason, Reform UK Candidate for the Dunster division by-election.

Jonathan Rollason is the Reform UK candidate for the 23rd October, Dunster division by-election in Somerset. We spoke with Jonathan about his decision to stand.

“I decided to stand for election because I want to ensure that local voices are heard loud and clear in decisions that affect our daily lives”

Can you introduce yourself to our readers, and tell us what made you decide to run?

I’ve lived in this community for many years and care deeply about the people and places that make it so special. I decided to stand for election because I want to ensure that local voices are heard loud and clear in decisions that affect our daily lives. Too often, residents feel that choices are made without them – I want to change that by being an accessible, accountable councillor who works with the community, not just on its behalf.

“A particular concern locally is the uncertainty around Minehead Hospital. Many people rely on it for essential services, and there’s real anxiety about the future of those services being reduced or centralised further away”

You’re the candidate for Dunster division ward. What are the main concerns in the area?

Dunster and the surrounding villages are proud, close-knit communities, but there are real challenges. Residents are worried about the lack of affordable housing for local people, the pressure on rural transport, and the need to protect our environment while supporting local businesses and tourism. Flooding, road safety, and access to services for older residents also come up again and again.

A particular concern locally is the uncertainty around Minehead Hospital. Many people rely on it for essential services, and there’s real anxiety about the future of those services being reduced or centralised further away. Protecting and strengthening the hospital’s role is vital if we want to make sure local people can get the care they need without long, difficult journeys.

“Somerset has huge potential, but we need a council that invests in people and places fairly, not just in the bigger towns”

What do you see as the major issues more widely in Somerset and if elected what do you hope to champion?

Across Somerset, many of the issues are shared – affordable housing, the future of farming, protecting our beautiful countryside, and ensuring our young people have opportunities to stay and thrive here. I’m particularly keen to champion better infrastructure for rural communities, stronger support for small businesses, and more joined-up action on climate and nature recovery. Somerset has huge potential, but we need a council that invests in people and places fairly, not just in the bigger towns.

How can people find out more or get involved in the campaign?

I’d love to hear from anyone who has questions, concerns, or ideas. People can get in touch by email chair.tivertonminehead@reformuk.com, or come along to one of the campaign events. Whether it’s displaying a poster, joining us on the doorstep, or just having a conversation, every bit of support matters – because this campaign is about working together for Dunster and Somerset.

Dale Layman, Reform UK Candidate for the Guildford South East ward by-election.

Dale Laymanis the Reform UK candidate for the 16th October Guildford South East ward by-election in Surrey. We spoke with Dale about his decision to stand.

“Like many people, I felt let down by the Conservatives, while Labour and the Liberal Democrats offer nothing more than managed decline. Reform UK is different”

Can you introduce yourself to our readers, and tell us what made you decide to run?

My name is Dale Layman, and I’ve lived in Guildford for over 30 years. After training for three years in Eastbourne, I began my career as a state-registered chiropodist in the NHS before moving into pharmaceutical sales. From “carrying the bag” as a representative, I worked my way up to become a national sales manager, enjoying more than 20 years of success in the industry before taking early retirement.

I joined Reform UK because, quite simply, I was tired of just complaining about the state of the country. Like many people, I felt let down by the Conservatives, while Labour and the Liberal Democrats offer nothing more than managed decline. Reform UK is different. We believe in controlled borders, safe streets, freedom of speech, hard work rewarded on merit, and energy security based on common sense, not net-zero dogma.

I didn’t join this party to make up the numbers. I believe my skills and drive can help take Reform forward locally and, in doing so, make a real difference to the lives of my fellow residents. Standing as a candidate is the obvious next step.

“Residents deserve practical, affordable policies that deliver real benefits — not expensive, ideological experiments”

You’re the candidate for Guildford South East ward. What are the main concerns in the area?

In Guildford South East, the concerns mirror those across much of Guildford — and Surrey as a whole — and they are deeply troubling. Residents pay some of the highest council taxes in the country but receive some of the poorest services in return.

Guildford Borough Council’s flagship Weyside Urban Village project is running a multi-million-pound deficit, while auditors have issued a “disclaimer of opinion” on the council’s accounts — a red flag for taxpayers. Meanwhile, developments such as the Guildford Cathedral site and North Street remain stalled, blocked, or watered down.

Housing pressures must be addressed, but building more homes is not enough — the infrastructure must come with it: schools, roads, and social care. I will prioritise brownfield regeneration, sustainable communities, and smarter use of derelict sites over unsustainable greenfield sprawl.

I also want to see common-sense transport policies that support motorists rather than punish them. That means opposing ULEZ-style charges, blanket 20mph zones, unaffordable energy schemes, and costly Vision Zero measures. Residents deserve practical, affordable policies that deliver real benefits — not expensive, ideological experiments.

What do you see as the major issues more widely in Surrey, and if elected, what do you hope to champion?

The challenges across Surrey are systemic. Financial mismanagement and poor decision-making have left Surrey County Council’s debt soaring by 48% in just one year — from £728.9 million to £1.07 billion. That burden falls directly on taxpayers and drains money away from vital services such as schools, roads, libraries, and social care.

If elected, I will fight to stop wasteful projects and restore financial discipline. Surrey residents deserve transparency, accountability and value for money. My priorities are:

  • Sound finances: tackling mismanagement so taxpayers’ money funds frontline services, not vanity schemes.
  • Sensible housing policy: development that’s planned responsibly, with infrastructure and services to match.
  • Transport freedom: rejecting punitive, anti-car policies and supporting measures that genuinely ease congestion and improve safety.

Above all, I want Surrey residents to feel their voices are heard, their money is respected, and their concerns are acted upon.

“The challenges across Surrey are systemic. Financial mismanagement and poor decision-making have left Surrey County Council’s debt soaring by 48% in just one year”

How can people find out more or get involved in the campaign?

If you’d like to get involved, please email our Chair, Graham Drage, at chair.guildford@guildfordreform.uk